Murder is the most serious crime in our world. Infanticide is murder! The next step after allowing late term abortions is legalizing infanticide. It is logical because the baby is the same person before birth as after. It seems like a cloud of evil has enveloped so much of the world. So many rejoice in invasion, murder, war, theft, abortion…
As a retired Christian pediatrician, I am so saddened by these developments in the UK and Canada. Assisted dying has always been extended to those beyond the "terminally ill". We Christians must continue to share the truth with a world full of spiritually desperate people. Thanks. Ayaan.
What has become of us that we would kill the most vulnerable? Indeed the “post Christian” era lacks any virtue whatsoever. A sorry state of affairs indeed.
The members in Parliament who voted for these measures must be either ignorant and/or immoral and/or insane. In addition, makes no sense at all to allow a mother to abort her child legally while a medical professional would be a criminal for doing the same thing.
Just another example of the camels nose under the tent. It doesn’t take much to see the next Eugenic steps. How will we alleviate the nation’s debt? The MP’s know.
The definition of life is self-sustaining and self-generating action. There is no stage of gestation that achieves this status, not fetal pain, not fetal heart beat, not viability. The reason abortion should be legal until birth is that before birth there is literally no life. The fetus is alive and it is human but it is not a life—a separate entity—breathing on its own until birth. Applying the concept of individual rights to protect the fetus is not justified because it is not yet an individual—it has not gone through the individuating event of birth.
That is my affirmative argument which I have posted many times in on-line discussions. What I never hear in response is the affirmative case (not just a rebuttal of mine) for the proposition that life begins at conception. In order to do this the proponent would have to define “life” to encompass a zygote. Such a definition has never been forthcoming in these discussions from the abortion prohibitionists. But hope springs eternal so I continue to post my case. Someone, please surprise me.
What is Ayaan's view on abortion? I think I recall from her book "Infidel" that she was against her sister having an abortion, but I might be mistaken - it was a while ago that I read that.
It was after that incident that she became an atheist. Did that change affect her views? And now that she is no longer an atheist, what are her views?
Murder is the most serious crime in our world. Infanticide is murder! The next step after allowing late term abortions is legalizing infanticide. It is logical because the baby is the same person before birth as after. It seems like a cloud of evil has enveloped so much of the world. So many rejoice in invasion, murder, war, theft, abortion…
As a retired Christian pediatrician, I am so saddened by these developments in the UK and Canada. Assisted dying has always been extended to those beyond the "terminally ill". We Christians must continue to share the truth with a world full of spiritually desperate people. Thanks. Ayaan.
What has become of us that we would kill the most vulnerable? Indeed the “post Christian” era lacks any virtue whatsoever. A sorry state of affairs indeed.
The members in Parliament who voted for these measures must be either ignorant and/or immoral and/or insane. In addition, makes no sense at all to allow a mother to abort her child legally while a medical professional would be a criminal for doing the same thing.
In Genesis 12:3, G-D States, "He who blesses Israel, I Will Bless;
and he who curses Israel, I Will Curse.
But G-D Also Commands us to protect the orphan and the widow.
To me the baby whose mother would murder him or her is surely an 'orphan';
and the'widow' I see as representing the elderly.
Countries like Canada, England, Wales, the Netherlands, etc., who dehumanise
these children of G-D, whether not yet born or elderly, will be cursed By G-D.
Return to the right path, before G-D Punishes you.
Space was not left for mission creep.
I know you are a master author and couldn't scribe the cynical fact we all know to be true.
The bill was written with expansion in mind. No mistaking intent here if your following these issues as long as I am.
Just another example of the camels nose under the tent. It doesn’t take much to see the next Eugenic steps. How will we alleviate the nation’s debt? The MP’s know.
The definition of life is self-sustaining and self-generating action. There is no stage of gestation that achieves this status, not fetal pain, not fetal heart beat, not viability. The reason abortion should be legal until birth is that before birth there is literally no life. The fetus is alive and it is human but it is not a life—a separate entity—breathing on its own until birth. Applying the concept of individual rights to protect the fetus is not justified because it is not yet an individual—it has not gone through the individuating event of birth.
That is my affirmative argument which I have posted many times in on-line discussions. What I never hear in response is the affirmative case (not just a rebuttal of mine) for the proposition that life begins at conception. In order to do this the proponent would have to define “life” to encompass a zygote. Such a definition has never been forthcoming in these discussions from the abortion prohibitionists. But hope springs eternal so I continue to post my case. Someone, please surprise me.
What is Ayaan's view on abortion? I think I recall from her book "Infidel" that she was against her sister having an abortion, but I might be mistaken - it was a while ago that I read that.
It was after that incident that she became an atheist. Did that change affect her views? And now that she is no longer an atheist, what are her views?